a team or group.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1

Investigate the advantages and disadvantages of working in a team or group.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Reasons why people work together in teams or groups are explained with reference to different types of activity.  Most aktifeties egets Dan faster it is more suksesfoel there is more idees to the progekt.

You can get difrent parties for the progrkt in the groep.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

Reasons why people work in teams include, but are not limited to sport, recreation, voluntary organisations, community projects, study and work.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Situations in own environment where working in a team would be more beneficial than working as an individual are investigated based on personal observation. Difrent pepel noes a lot of difrent informasen a boet there invaroument. Difrent pepel are good at there one ting. Difrent pepel kan bring there one suksesfoelnis and endevidolnis to the groep.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

Potential risks associated with working in a team or group are identified in terms of negative consequences for the individual and the group. Negativetie can ouker whit confliek whit in comniekason thy donet cminiekat afiesenlie thy mate have a one way cominicason, culture the pepel ion the groep myt cam from difrent culture and myt not agrie on the the sabjekt bekos of there culture,ther personality style  myt difer from one a nater and thy myt diseagrie on sam tings.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

Risks include, but are not limited to, personality style, competition, balance of power, faith, class, cultural, internal politics and gender risks.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2

Identify the characteristics of an effective team or group.  Good comoeniekason, delekgat from the lieder,difrent idees,working togeter

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

The characteristics of an effective team or group are explored for different types of groups.  Difrent taps of groops have difrent persenaleties thy hafe difrent posetife ponets, thy have difrent uoniek indefiegels.thy have difrent progeks thy have difren resorses laberary internet

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Reasons that a specific group or team is effective in working together are explained with particular reference to the purpose of the group and relationships within the group or team. Thy can have a good relasensip thy mate have difrent taps of persenaleties that can woor toegeter.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

Behaviours and attitudes that reflect positive relationships are identified with examples.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

The role of communication channels in building relationships is discussed for a specific group or team.  Wen you ar in a groep u need to communicat so that the relasenship can grou and the tiem work kan cam more saksesfol  and more suksesfol.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

The potential impact of own strengths and weaknesses on a particular group or team is identified and an indication is given of how these could affect relationships and the achievement of group goals. IT can make the groep grow and one can help a nater uoseng there strengs by helping them whit there weekneses and thange them in to strong ponts.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3

Identify the roles and responsibilities of individuals in a team or group.  Thy need to folou out the task in the tiem by there foelist potensel and normelie thy wood see hoemenie tiem members thy have and tiem members will then be gifen there tasks and hoe long thy have for the task.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

The different roles required for the effective functioning of a selected group are described for a specific situation.  For difrent sitoehasons u need sirten skiels or strenks to to the task suksesfoelie.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

The responsibilities of each member of a team or group are identified in relation to the purpose and goals of the group.  Thy wood have a task for them self to compliet soe thst st the end the indefiegegels tasks fill form in to a progekt and ets tiem members talsk will indiekat the seksesfoel nis of the progekt by the  why thy did it and  the sefiesennis of the progekt.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

The learner's own role in a specific group is explained in terms of contribution, responsibility and accountability.  To the persen bekos thy will take responsebeletie for it thy can be The task is handed accountability of the progekt and thy will delifer there contrebouton to the tiem.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4

Explore techniques to manage group dynamics. You can deliegat the groep you can help the groep defelop there stongponts.you can coets them. You can be there liether.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Techniques for managing conflict constructively are investigated for a specific group situation.  YOU can do itindefiegelie and asses them or you can asses them as a groep and then you can pout it out inone by all the informason you have gaterd and then get bak to them whit a seloesen.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Problem solving processes are discussed as a means of finding creative solutions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

The importance of effective communication as a technique is explained and an indication is given of the consequences of poor communication for group dynamics.  Wat you soed not do limited to active listening,uoes non-verbal communication.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

Effective communication includes, but is not limited to active listening, assertiveness, non-verbal communication and clear self expression.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

The process of review and reflection is applied as a means of monitoring individual and group achievement.