monique Hospetelety and Manigement: December 2011

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Carry out maintenance checks on equipment used for culling or harvesting.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Suitable equipment is selected for a particular culling or harvesting operation.
You need to toes and diesaed wat tools you will uos for the job that needs to be an forienstens Fishing nets, mist nets, cages, firearms, boma plastic, ropes.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Fishing nets, mist nets, cages, firearms, boma plastic, ropes, etc.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Equipment is checked for evidence of wear and tear.
You need to mane taen uor tools so that your tools dount get hert and you cant uos it eniemore. You need to manetaen and serwes uor tools.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Needed maintenance work is carried out to ensure trouble free service as it applies to the use of the identified equipment.
You need to have mantenas for all the work to be dane and for all the workers tha woorkd for you.You need to have mantenes so that you now uor work is Dan ifeiesenty and saksesfoll sou that you can make profet.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Carry out appropriate harvesting procedures.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Appropriate harvesting methods is identified and described as it applies to the culling of harvesting operation.
You need to selek the ekwipment you will uos for uor project.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Appropriate harvesting procedures are applied in the participation in harvesting or culling activitiesmace manie you can make of the animal..

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Products are processed in line with local veterinary, legal and quality assurance requirements.
You need to volou , legal and quality assurance requirements for the projek sou that the it folous saksesfolie wen it is Dan in the end.You wane see hou

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Harvesting activities are monitored to ensure that they are appropriate.
You need to seek the aproupriet monietoring system for thes progekst.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Collect and record basic biological data of the specimens captured.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Data is collected to ensure accurate record keeping of captured specimens.
You need to see how mace data you have and then prouses the date so that it get all the informason sortet.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The required biological data of the specimens captured, such as size, weight and gender is recorded.
You need to prouharetas the data from gender is recorded ook at it a gen youn kan tast look it up.so that it is stord and kep in a safe plas so that if youn need to l

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Data specific to the area of removal is recorded.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Report on the harvest.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A report on the harvest is drafted and submitted to the supervisor in line with organisational requirements.
You need to report ewrietin so that it is on paper and so that it is rkorded and the data is sorted sou it gets plasd in rate order.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Reference is made to adherence to bag limits (where relevant).
You need to kiep inmand that he beg takes onlie soumats and it hase limets .

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Reference is made to adherence to permit conditions (where relevant).
You need tom get permets wen it is not hantieng sieson and sou that thy now you are makien a lifien out of thes and so you woen get in trabel and you have permieson.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Amount landed, weight, numbers (catch returns).

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Investigate the advantages and disadvantages of working in a team or group.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Reasons why people work together in teams or groups are explained with reference to different types of activity.
Most aktifeties egets Dan faster it is more suksesfoel there is more idees to the progekt.
You can get difrent parties for the progrkt in the groep.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Reasons why people work in teams include, but are not limited to sport, recreation, voluntary organisations, community projects, study and work.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Situations in own environment where working in a team would be more beneficial than working as an individual are investigated based on personal observation.
Difrent pepel noes a lot of difrent informasen a boet there invaroument. Difrent pepel are good at there one ting. Difrent pepel kan bring there one suksesfoelnis and endevidolnis to the groep.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Potential risks associated with working in a team or group are identified in terms of negative consequences for the individual and the group.
Negativetie can ouker whit confliek whit in comniekason thy donet cminiekat afiesenlie thy mate have a one way cominicason, culture the pepel ion the groep myt cam from difrent culture and myt not agrie on the the sabjekt bekos of there culture,ther personality style myt difer from one a nater and thy myt diseagrie on sam tings.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Risks include, but are not limited to, personality style, competition, balance of power, faith, class, cultural, internal politics and gender risks.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Identify the characteristics of an effective team or group.
Good comoeniekason, delekgat from the lieder,difrent idees,working togeter

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The characteristics of an effective team or group are explored for different types of groups.
Difrent taps of groops have difrent persenaleties thy hafe difrent posetife ponets, thy have difrent uoniek indefiegels.thy have difrent progeks thy have difren resorses laberary internet

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Reasons that a specific group or team is effective in working together are explained with particular reference to the purpose of the group and relationships within the group or team.
Thy can have a good relasensip thy mate have difrent taps of persenaleties that can woor toegeter.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Behaviours and attitudes that reflect positive relationships are identified with examples.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The role of communication channels in building relationships is discussed for a specific group or team.
Wen you ar in a groep u need to communicat so that the relasenship can grou and the tiem work kan cam more saksesfol and more suksesfol.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
The potential impact of own strengths and weaknesses on a particular group or team is identified and an indication is given of how these could affect relationships and the achievement of group goals.
IT can make the groep grow and one can help a nater uoseng there strengs by helping them whit there weekneses and thange them in to strong ponts.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Identify the roles and responsibilities of individuals in a team or group.
Thy need to folou out the task in the tiem by there foelist potensel and normelie thy wood see hoemenie tiem members thy have and tiem members will then be gifen there tasks and hoe long thy have for the task.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The different roles required for the effective functioning of a selected group are described for a specific situation.
For difrent sitoehasons u need sirten skiels or strenks to to the task suksesfoelie.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The responsibilities of each member of a team or group are identified in relation to the purpose and goals of the group.
Thy wood have a task for them self to compliet soe thst st the end the indefiegegels tasks fill form in to a progekt and ets tiem members talsk will indiekat the seksesfoel nis of the progekt by the why thy did it and the sefiesennis of the progekt.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The learner's own role in a specific group is explained in terms of contribution, responsibility and accountability.
To the persen bekos thy will take responsebeletie for it thy can be
The task is handed accountability of the progekt and thy will delifer there contrebouton to the tiem.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Explore techniques to manage group dynamics.
You can deliegat the groep you can help the groep defelop there stongponts.you can coets them. You can be there liether.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Techniques for managing conflict constructively are investigated for a specific group situation.
YOU can do itindefiegelie and asses them or you can asses them as a groep and then you can pout it out inone by all the informason you have gaterd and then get bak to them whit a seloesen.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Problem solving processes are discussed as a means of finding creative solutions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The importance of effective communication as a technique is explained and an indication is given of the consequences of poor communication for group dynamics.
Wat you soed not do limited to active listening,uoes non-verbal communication.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Effective communication includes, but is not limited to active listening, assertiveness, non-verbal communication and clear self expression.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The process of review and reflection is applied as a means of monitoring individual and group achievement.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Demonstrate an understanding of the effective use of time scheduling in the workplace.
OUTCOME NOTES
Work-Scheduling Rules should include: daily and weekly working hours, breaks, start and finish work hours and hour-time.
OUTCOME RANGE
Work-scheduling methods should include: clock cards; timesheets; attendance registers; job cards; electronic access cards

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Workplace work-scheduling rules and procedures are identified and understood.
SO that the work kan be Dan ivesenlie. So that u have inave pepel to work and not ower work uor stafemembers.so that uor stafe now wat to do and hoe the worek soed be dane.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Work-schedules are completed according to workplace procedures.
The Work-schedules is dane acordien to the wore that mast be danand hoemenie stafe member it will consoem and the tam that the worek wil consoem.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Manage time plan in the workplace.
OUTCOME RANGE
The following variations must be covered: business cycles, additional work loads and normal production requirements

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Time management problems are correctly identified (e.g. conflicting goals, work overload etc).
Wen problems are identiefad in the work plas it is olwas sensetfe. You need to take the problrm out of the work plas and deskas it whit the work members so tha ater stafe donet getinfofd or the stafemembers privet spaes do not get infade olwas handel the problem white Ker.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Time required for particular tasks are identified according to workplace operating standards.
The talsk that mast be Dan dering the day is work out of the fologn the namber of stafe the namber of talsk and the tam it wil consoem of the day and then t6he staf will be difated in groeps and then the talsk will be handed out to the groeps.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Goals are set and action plans are implemented within required workplace time-frames.
The goal is set so that the talsk kan be dan in the steps and saksesfoel and that the claend is olwas happe whit the end resalt and so the talsk kan be Dan in tame.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Action plans are implemented timeously.
The plan is workd out so that it is tamsefiesent and do not take aneseserie tam up from a nater talsk.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
5. Time management plan is monitored and reviewed.
It is monitord so that the it is Dan in the corekt wy and saksesfol and so that thy do there do there job as there skegel ses it soed be dan and so it is tam sefiesent and do not take tam that coed have ben uosd for a nater talsk.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Apply corrective action steps where work-scheduling problems occur.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Work-scheduling problems are identified (e.g. external factors: insufficient or inefficient resources. Internal Factors: personal problems)
It is Dan by having difrent plans in skegel that will soe problems and ater plans that have seloesons to the problem and thy can do tiem bilding.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Consultation happens with relevant authorities to discuss possible solutions (e.g. immediate supervisor).
It happens to the problep so that the probles get soeloesens like forienstens the parties sit doen an piek to one a nater so thy solve the iesoe. The parties kan olsou help one a nater to moefe the problem together by helping one anater.

nature conservation

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Explain the concept and principles of nature conservation in broad terms.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The concept of nature conservation is explained in broad terms.
To presser in live. You need to conserve ewrieting a roend you.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The principles of nature conservation are outlined as to define the role and purpose of Nature Conservation.
It need the prensepals of nature conservation.You need to treet tings whit conpasen and cer and you need to respek ewrieting.The resorses need to be sestanebel ower tame soe that it can serwawe. You need manie to kiep tings sestanebel normelie it will be a conserwasen fie.Sastanebeletie hase 3 conseps; it is visikal aspeks , coltser and manie.s and z crafes is paret of it.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
A comparison is drawn between sustainable and unsustainable use of natural resources.
Wen you kiep ewrieting sastanebel then you will be more saksesfoll. If you are no sestanebel ewrieting will voluot of plas and not be saksesfol.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Outline the history of nature conservation.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
An outline is given of key developments in the history of nature conservation as it applies to changing emphasis within this operational environment.
Ter is pases that natseer conerwason needs to go troe in biodiversetie and protected erieas and anemail centers.Ther will be a paredam shifet bekos of spiesies conervasen then it bekam biodeversetie conservason. I is the amount of difrent spiesies in a eriea. Anemel towords people conservason .Protektafe erie towords landscape you need to mak conservansies wit ewrie one els.protekted eries woed change to landskap eries it needs to be lager than smoler. It needs to be more complex than simpel.Thy started whit peace parks foundason to do the tranfrontier park. It is peope lthat lifed of the basieks thy woeed diek or hanet or plaant food to serwafe .Thy wood moef on a loukasen then thy wood bildd there hoem ollower a gen.Thy wood then meet ater people on the moewment from plas to plas then thy started making agriemints to food and there anemals(goets and sheep) thy made wepens whit stoens and tools.It is the stoen age.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Species conservation to biodiversity conservation, animal-centred to people-centred approaches, protected areas to landscape conservation.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Key phases in the development of Nature Conservation is identified and discussed.
The inpaket was werie minimal at that tam.The rieson why the hoel sosaetie had to pak up and liefd bekos of droet not inafe woter. Thy had a hi inpakt but wer werie loukal.Thy hade ganpoeder then thy hade gold.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Demonstrate the relevance of nature conservation principles to society.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The value of nature conservation is explained as it applies to its aesthetic and ecological value.
Eco system;is it sistanebel. Is the system intakt.is it servavel for O2 or Ho2.Legastrasen for futser generasens;it is the raet ting to do. It is globel worming.the ecosystem is colepsing.herititgeit is wort preserving.Economie;It infolwes toerisem. It infolwes traning.It infolwes medsan.Recreation; u ree kraet uorself.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The relevance of nature conservation is explained as it applies to the legacy of nature conservation for future generations. See assessment criteria 1

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The importance of nature conservation is explained as it applies to its economic and recreational value. . See assessment criteria 1

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The contribution of nature conservation to a nation's health is described.
See assessment criteria 1

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Explain the inter-relatedness within ecosystems.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The meaning of eco-system inter-relatedness is clarified through the use of key conservation terms.
Food chains; it is jast a strat line from tings that eets ater tings it dasent split up .Food webs;it is owerlaping of food chains. A trophic levels is lewels of anemails that serwafe one eting one a nater.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Food chains, food webs and trophic levels.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The importance of conserving the integrity of the habitat is explained as it applies to the promoting of the survival of species.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5
Identify scarce plants and animals.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
An outline is provided of the work of local, national and international conservations agencies.
, national; IT IS SONDELA and international THES IS THE ATER CANTRIES. conservations agencies
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Statement:

• NGO's non gavermental organasasen, IUCN ,TRAFFIC, WWF-SA. World wildlife fund

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Definitions are provided along with relevant examples of what is meant by the expression "red data"
It is wat is indangerd it tells you wat you sood not do.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
A tabulation is given of CITES categories.
The confensen of internasenal in indangerd spiesies;Thy onlie deeld whit trade. Thy do trading whit ater poepel and permets.You need a cites permet whit the ater permit in trading.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
An outline is provided of other degrees of scarcity/abundance of species.

nature conservation

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Demonstrate respect for others, their possessions and the environment.
OUTCOME NOTES
Demonstrate respect for others, their possessions and the environment taking into account cultural protocols.
Wen soening respect you need to egnloieg hoe and wat thy are and from wat caltseer. You may not make fun of there caltseer. You need to respect the infaroument by not troeng papers aroend. Respect other people's possessions by applying own individual norms and abiding by laws and regulations.
OUTCOME RANGE
Respect other people's possessions by applying own individual norms and abiding by laws and regulations.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.

They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.

As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.

The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.

Method of assessment:

Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.

A range of assessment methods should be used, including:

Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)

Integrated assessment
It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.

Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Articulate different cultural interests and values with regard to the environment.
You need to take in wat is aroend u and then you can poet the calter in to that inwaroement and see if that is wer thy cam from if that is there herietiets.
OUTCOME RANGE
Wise/responsible use of natural resources, e.g. medicinal plant/animal collection, harvesting of animals and firewood.
Sympathetic and empathetic interaction with people of different cultural backgrounds and values on environmental issues.
Outlines different ethical perspectives.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.
As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.
The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.
Method of assessment:
Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)
Integrated assessment
It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.

Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Explain which interactions will achieve a successful environment.
Wen man do not diestrooi there infaroement. Thy soed not liter at all thy soed kiep there woter higieniek thy sood nat staret fiers.
OUTCOME NOTES
Explain which interactions between humans and the natural environment will achieve a successful environment.
If uoemess relies wat the infaroement can gief for us and wat it dos for mankind then thy soed stop literieng ,peloeting woter ,start fiers bekos the hard work we poet in the infaroement it giefs bek.
OUTCOME RANGE
Understand the interaction between man and his environment by acting responsibly (with regard to littering, fires, water, fauna and flora).
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge.
As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment.
The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent.
Method of assessment:
Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation.
A range of assessment methods should be used, including:
Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions
Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner
Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment
Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard
Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (eg: reports from a third party)
Integrated assessment
It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'.
Consider a complete activity in the workplace (the 'whole of work' approach) and see which unit standards relate to this activity.
Work out how practitioners could collect evidence on a number of unit standards at the same time covering all the critical aspects of the standards
Ensure that commonalities that exist between a number of unit standards are captured in a way that makes sense for assessment.

Maintenance Field Infrastructure

Maintenance Field Infrastructure
Specifiek outcome1
1. Howe to maintain infrastructure?
You need to identiefaai the problem first and thrn us the rate tools to fieks the problrm.You need to look at your infrastrakter regirlerlie to bekos that is what maintaining means and to see if u need to faeces it.
2. What is the negative and positive of maintaining infrastructures?
It is wen good things cam wen fieksing the surroundings that needs to be fieksd or wen u get bad things happening bekos you don’t faeces the rsepondings that are broken.
3. Is the problem in you or scoup?
You need to have a look at the problem and see if it is in your ranges to faeces it.
Specifiek outcome2
1. How woed u report the problem?
You need to report the problem warble and retenlie so that the problem gets fiekst kwieker. So that the rite report can surf as proof on a long term bases.
2. Hou woed u poet the problem in a scoup?
Rate the problem on a scale to see how urgent the problem needs to be fieksd and if it fols in our ranges of fieksien problems.
Specifiek outcome3
1. Bay home will you get otorasason to faeces the problem and us ekwoepment?
You need otorasasen from the senior manager in your department to faeces the problem and us the elopement.
2. What tools do you need to faeces the problem?
You need to make a list of all the tools u will need so that u can san them out for wen u take them out of the stories and san them back in wen u poet them back.
problem. Specifiek outcome4
What do u need to asses?
You woed need to assess the affective Nis of the fieksieng.
How woed u improve the fieksing of problem?
By using after peoples sagestos and see if thy wood work for the problem and be the salooson to our

Maintenance Field Infrastructure

Hiv

Estimated HIV prevalence (%) among antenatal clinic attendees, by province
Province 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
KwaZulu-Natal 33.5 36.5 37.5 40.7 39.1 39.1 38.7 38.7 39.5
Mpumalanga 29.2 28.6 32.6 30.8 34.8 32.1 34.6 35.5 34.7
Free State 30.1 28.8 30.1 29.5 30.3 31.1 31.5 32.9 30.1
Gauteng 29.8 31.6 29.6 33.1 32.4 30.8 30.5 29.9 29.8
North West 25.2 26.2 29.9 26.7 31.8 29.0 30.6 31.0 30.0
Eastern Cape 21.7 23.6 27.1 28.0 29.5 28.6 28.8 27.6 28.1
Limpopo 14.5 15.6 17.5 19.3 21.5 20.6 20.4 20.7 21.4
Northern Cape 15.9 15.1 16.7 17.6 18.5 15.6 16.5 16.2 17.2
Western Cape 8.6 12.4 13.1 15.4 15.7 15.1 15.3 16.1 16.9
National 24.8 26.5 27.9 29.5 30.2 29.1 29.4 29.3 29.4
Provinces that recorded the highest HIV prevalence were KwaZulu-Natal (39.5%), Mpumalanga (34.7%), Free State (30.1%) and the North-west (30%). The Northern Cape and Western Cape recorded the lowest prevalence at 17.2% and 16.9% respectively.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Identify the species or specimen(s) to be harvested.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The correct harvest site is found within a reasonable amount of time.
It is wen thy need to make a toes wer thy wane harves and hoe long thy take to faned a pales.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The relevant species or specimen(s) to be harvested is identified.

You can harvest wood for difrent perpers. You can harest gras for the roef. You need to identiefay the rate tap of item to make for the raet perpes
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The precise location of the relevant species or specimen(s) is determined.
You need to determen if the erie have inafe woter and then the groend should have inafe noetries weloe for the specimen .you need to look at the clamet if the speseman neets aspesefiek wededer condieson.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Relevant species are correctly identified by sight.
You need to look at it properlie then you soed be abel to determen what spesemen it is bekos of calor saes and forem.You neet do ideniefay the spesefiek eriea on the lokason.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Species is identified in the language of harvesters.
Then langwets that the person is in that harves the atem then it will be determen wat spesemen it is in that langwets.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Carry out the harvesting process.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The harvesting of flora is conducted according to organisational and legislative procedures.

And so the job kan be dane the faster way.You need to folo the low and if I are aloed to cut it or not.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Correct species are harvested in the correct locality by means of the correct method.
You need to ideniefay the meterd tat u will uos for thes progekt. You need to identiefay wat tools you will uoes for thes progekt. And so the job kan be dane the faster way.You need to see wat tape of item will be hrvest and it mast not be progtektife plant.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Harvesting is carried out according to occupational health and safety procedures.
You need to hrves the corek meterd to hrvest the rate tape of planet.Youn need to ideniefa dhe corek lokasen that you are aloed to harves on.Wat will you uos to cate the wood whit wat tools will you uos on thes progekt.
You need to look at the operasonela helt and saftie wen you do the job forienstend,owerol gogel glofes viser eermafes.the masien the chaen sore needs to be in a serwesel condieson.The person need to have proper tranieng to work whit the tools.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Supervise the harvesting process where conducted by authorised temporary harvesters.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Steps are taken to ensure that the agreed-to 'rules of harvest' are effectively communicated and upheld.
You need to soeperwaesand manieges.You need to desad wer you wane haves what you wane havest for wat rieson will you havest it for is the spiesies proetekted. Wen will you haves it.are you doen it foling the lose orders.Did you piek upor tools are the person that will do it trande in the proper way wat cwantetie will you do it foling.Thy need to need to comoeniekat to the harvesterand the conterekter and to the orgnasason.You need to upheld the operason by the lowe.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Provisions are made for the adequate care of temporary harvesters.
Thy need shelter thy need a batroom whit a toilet and hot woter . there needs to be amedekel ciet or you need tohave plan for bieger ingeries.thy need to sty on the erie werthy work.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Steps are taken to ensure that harvesters remain in the general area of harvest.
Thy need to sty in the erie wer thy work. So that the savtie isoes can be stop aswel as poetsieng.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The harvesting process is supervised in such a manner that sound human relations are maintained at all times.
You need to treet your workesr whit respect and it cm doen to human raets.You need to wates for the way you treet uor workers.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Record, report and reflect on the harvest.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The harvest is measured in a practical, efficient and timeous manner.
You need to meser the wood troe a bage and wen it is foel.you can meser it in loeds.the mesers needs to be praktiekel.it needs to be afesent . it ndoent needs to take a lote of tame.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The harvest is accurately weighed according to the standard weighing system prescribed for each species by the employer/landowner.
The woed needs to be waed so that all the prases needs to be rekend.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The harvest is recorded in the format required by operational procedures (that is, accurately recorded using the system prescribed by the employer/landowner).
You need to record wer youn cat the wood and wer you cat the wood and hoemas of the wood you cat.you need to maniege the houe proeses.record needs to de Dan on difrent waes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A harvest report is prepared containing all the information required to maintain a harvest management system.
The person that cats the wood needs to do a report to the manies ment sou that the the skegels needs to foll in plaes.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Lessons learnt are identified and built into plans for future harvesting.
You need to sestan the howel prouses.you need to worek it outb sou yhat you now that your operasen works all the tam and so uor sestem is workin aproureritlie.

Fires

Fires
Specific outcom1
1. Hou will u do the legestrasen?
You will do it by engaging a fire at the rate tame of the here.
2. How will you do the efektafnes of the fire?
You will do it by defrauding the fiaer fathers in to groups. Suppression it is the person hoe delegates and equipment and retarders the people hoe faets the fire.
Specific outcom2
1. How woed u now hoe the weather will be wen engaging a fire?
You woed call the weather channel and ask what the water will be for that day and then work out our fire strategies around that informant.
How will you present a fire goni in to laager area?
You woed have to do fire brakes were u take all the trees and grass out for about 7m to prevent the fire gon in to laager area and diestrum it.
Specific outcom3
1. Hou will u redoes fire risks?
You will redoes fire risks by making fire brakes before the tam. To check the weter canals and and making sour your equipment is up to standard and useable all tams.

252460 cultural

252460 cultural
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Define basic concepts of cultural heritage resource management.
You get natseral and cultural.It gets pasd down from one generason to a nater

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
An explanation is given of the concept "Cultural Heritage Resource Management".
You get natseral and cultural.It gets pasd down from one generason to a nater.You have resorses but it needs to be maniges to the stanebeletie ower tame if you don’t manieg it then you will loes the saets welou.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The concept of "Cultural Heritage Resource Management" is related to the needs of South African society.
It gets past doen to tame.Thy have the need so that there cultural heretieg needs to be protected and sastand in tame toewords ewrie one.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
An outline is given of the connection between cultural heritage resource management and nature conservation.
The cultural heritage is in the nature and it has the sam weloes an the nature conservation . Bout needs to be maniegest soo that it can be carried out to the voetser generasons.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
An overview is presented of the most important principles of cultural heritage resource management.
The plas needs to be sastaned and you need to have manie to sastan the eriea you need to have toerest to get manie but you need to have reserts to have fakts to tel the toerest.You need to make infrastrakter and then you need to have astetieks sou that the plas can be sastanebel.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Describe local cultural heritage practices, traditions and sites.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Sites within the area of operation are visually identified.
Existing sites needs to be up held and mantenes needs to be done, previously unidentified sites are recognized you need to regenasd tings in the anrekonasebel.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Existing sites, previously unidentified sites are recognized.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A description is given of local practices and traditions relevant to a site.
Local Practices;There are reteowels and samgomas is paret of it. Beads was uosd as a carentsie that’s y there is status.Thy have have stouns of tools.Local tradisons; hinting to skinning, skraping,gatering bolbes of food.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The importance is explained of managing and preserving cultural sites and artefacts.
Thy wood uos stoens to make potes like potterery thy wood moef to sites but there wer artefacts and historical in ewrie sites wer thy woore and that wer the tradiesons of there generason.The wer dfrent trabes.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Traditions, pottery, rock paintings, artefacts and historical sites.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Monitor cultural heritage sites.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A justification is given for preserving a cultural heritage site within the area of operation.
Hoe is ower toeresem indestree hoe is ower target market.You need to monietor the amount of poepel and you do it troe evaluaton forms the amount of people thels you if the plaes is good inaf troe sirwes. The infrastrakter needs to be good to chop whit thes.The carryng capacity mast be in plas and working.YOU need to jastefay.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
An outline is provided of the causes of cultural heritage site deterioration.
The temproter needs to be raet. The humidity mast be perfekt.The natserel elements will deteriorate ower tam.Vandelisem soed not takek plaes.Ignorens soed not take plas in whit the toerists.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Assistance is rendered in compiling an inventory of the important artefacts and/or cultural assets on the heritage site.
You can make a inventrie of wat the poepel wer all a belt but u will go dige up there rabiesdamp to do that and to tel ater poepel a boet them.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Assistance is rendered in implementing a management plan for the cultural heritage site.
To maniege you need to uos wat, wen,wer,whou,

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
An explanation is given of how visitor requirements are accommodated within the context of the law and site management plan.
You need to deskas OHS,gides,the calter,food,

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Outline relevant aspects of cultural heritage legislation.
It belongs to the state.The people of the sitie that lifes in the sitie is pang to kiep the cultural sate sastanebel and aswel as the toorests.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A distinction is made between sustainable and non-sustainable utilisation of cultural resources.
sustainable ; It is to kiep the cultural site in good condieson and to fieks tings that is broken. non-sustainable;Is wen the site is in bad condieson and it dasent work properlie bekos it is foling out of one a nater .AND you need to monitor the amount of gest that visets there the plas needs tio be abel to handel that amount of poepel.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Monitoring the carrying capacity of visitors on site.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
An overview is presented of key aspects of legislation relevant to the management of a cultural heritage site. You need to ewaluaton the amount of poepel that weset your toeresem saet.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
An outline is provided of penalties incurred for damage/mismanagement of a site.
If there is damaging the site you will be pienelasd by there system.If you mismanagement the site you will fase a peneltie.

Controling non dangeris anemails 252459

Controling non dangeris anemails 252459
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Identify and locate non-dangerous damage causing animals.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Non-dangerous damage causing animals are identified and listed.
Krieke,Anteloups,Flies,Mongoes,Bees,Monkies,Birdes,Cniefors,Mossies,Trmaets,Worthogs,mise, rats.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Tracking skills are used to identify non-dangerous damage causing animals.
You will uos your senses Look you will look for spoor. Lisen,you wood lisen to soends that is anuoesel.Smell,tings that is rotend or that atrakt flies.You can yoes dogs bekos thy kan smell werie good.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The behaviour of non-dangerous damage causing animals are identified and described.
Behaviour; You need to now wat thy eet, You need to now hoe long thy live,You need to now wer thy live.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
An overview is given of regulations arising out of legislation applicable to game removal operations as it applies to non-dangerous damage causing animals.
You need to regelat the system .You need to set the regelasens that needs to be folod.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Assist in control measures for non-dangerous damage causing animals within the area of operation.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Trapping and baiting techniques used during control operations relating to non-dangerous damage causing animals are applied as per organisational requirements.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Control measures are maintained to provide assistance in the capturing of non-dangerous damage causing animals.
It nomelie is a soet meterd. You can have a system that control the pest whit cwmiekals or capserieng.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Poisons, sprays and/or biological agents are applied in accordance with applicable legislation and manufacturer's instructions.
Thy cats anemals or kiel them by poeting meet outwhit cemiekals. You can spry cemiekils.You can uos tings like em.You can uos biological meterds.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Breeding sites are limited to control certain species.
You need to now wer thy live its depends wat anemel it is.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Carry out skinning, disposal, preservation and other procedures to remove carcasses of animals.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Assistance is provided in the carrying out of skinning, disposal and other procedures as it relates to the disposal of carcasses.
You need to trou them a way on a weloubel way . you can bire it nomelie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Assistance is given in the preservation of carcasses as per operational requirements.
You will you presser it you can staf the anemel or you can take the skien and triet it or uyou can yous the boens.You can uos it for saentifiek rieserts.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Assist in community interactions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Assistance is rendered in communicating with the local community in addressing problem animal incidents.
You need to assees the problem .You need to toll to the persen intarge to get to a seloesen. You have a brod piekser to soe the seloesens.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Information is gathered from local communities as it relates to problem animals.
You need to get infomason towords the problem hoe you can prewent it and solf it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Assistance is rendered in addressing problems with non-dangerous damage causing animals through the dissemination of information.
You need to see the seloeswen to the problem.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Assistance is rendered in the educating of local communities about damage causing animals.
You neet to tel and shoe the poepel wat is gonin and wat hepens

252457 Erosion

252457 Erosion
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and improve on them.
Eroeson 3 taps sheet;It is wen if there is a lot of woter then it flas ewrieting a way bekos it is a vlat sheet.Rill;It myks was and there is more the one and thy normelie got to one plas.Gully; is wen it myks bug laes .
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A list is made of the techniques that are currently available.
Gabion baskets .ranches , water bars and barriers, active seeding, capping, contouring, erosion reclamation, boardwalks, stone packing, brush packing, cladding.The is ways that will work a roend the erosin. There is a why that will work to preven it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A detailed explanatory note is written on each of these techniques.
Gabion baskets It is a basket but it is buld of mes you take roks and poet it insad the basket and cloes it ontop it is bult to interlink whit one a nater. You will buld it to be stable and it is for plant grouet.It is newer virtiekal., bTou cone link the gabion on one a nater whit wier.ranches There is a siet that hase erasen wer you will pak a lot of branses to prevent the erousen it is normelie most comen to uos itr in seet erousen Brans Pit Seed is mos logiekal and more evektaf Brans Pit Seed is mos logiekal and more evektafEcologiekal is happenien ekonomie is hapenieng. , water bars and barriers, active seeding;It is wen you poet the seeds in the hoels an dthen cweiet up ip whiy brances., capping, contouring, erosion reclamation, boardwalks, stone packing ;You nee to pak stoens sou that nating wases a way and so that nating desterb., brush packing, cladding.The is ways that will work a roend the erosin. There is a why that will work to preven it.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
A summary is given of the techniques that were found to work best under particular conditions.
Seeding is one of the vooi that workt in erouson bekos there is no desterbens it grous whit out owergrasing befor id ewen started groening properlie. It is helyie bekos the groend gets soo mace more neetriens of ool the tings that braksdoun and go's in to the groend. You jast need to chek it and kiiep an ie on it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Lessons learned are noted in order to apply these to future practice.
The branses need to be pakt hi inaf and brod inaf so that anemels cant riets to the insad.Wen your paking stoens you need to pak them sou that anemalis cant desterb that eriea but it still gets neew groet.You as there but that myby naterel.need to do it in a way that the groend don’t was a way that it st naterel seeds and tings get wast ontop of it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
A report on remedial actions taken is given and possible aspects for improvement are identified.
We have pak the branses in the erie and it is hy inaf and brod inaf but maby we can inproef it by paking branses insad aswel sou that riegroet can take plas iesieer.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6
Assistance is rendered in the rehabilitation of selected areas by planting grass and/or other forms of vegetation as appropriate.
You can get sam won proevesonel or that nowes it wel to tel you wer is a good spot to plant grass but you woed maby get a nater opienjen on wer you wood plant the grass and hoe you will plant the grasss and wat tap of gras will you plant.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Implement systems of remediation and report on them.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Assistance is rendered in planning, organizing and implementing remediation.
You can get sam one profesonel that will help you to plan and wat why will you prewent this from happenieng.You need to orgenas thes and maksoor that is gone work and hoe will do wat and wen will it be Dan.Then you need to make ti happen and go to the saet and start whit the ly out and then cary troe.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A report is prepared outlining the problem and the proposed solution.
Wen you have lad it out on the sat and you fand problems a long the way you nee to rat them doen and then see wat is arount that eriea and then cam up whi a seloeson that will vieks it and not damiedsd the hoel program.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
The signs of erosion, possible causes, and extent of erosion as well as remedial actions taken.
Wen you see all your groend is flasd a way constentlie .wen you see that all the natural elements is taken a way and there is nating that will prewent it .You could camp it ofwhit branses or roks sou that ti das not was ewrieting a way a and prewent anemals and piepel vrom desterbing that eriea.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Suggestions are made on possible remedial intervention actions.
You can make soor that a serten step is constenlie repieted so that it has a beter afekt in the end.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Control erosion through taking appropriate remedial action in the long and short term.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Interventions are implemented that are aimed at controlling the causes of erosion in the particular area.
It you pak sam branses on the erosen sat then you can get riegrot anemals can myk nest there ant hy woed poep there that will theo no a laterstage brak don and go into the grond and gife neetriens in the groend ant the neew groet will then be good kwaletie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A selection is made of techniques appropriate to the problem.
For difrent eroesen there is difrent teknieks to be yousd. Eroeson 3 taps sheet;It is wen if there is a lot of woter then it flas ewrieting a way bekos it is a vlat sheet branches will work for sheet erosen.Rill;It myks was and there is more the one and thy normelie got to one plas active seeding it will work for rill eroeson..Gully; is wen it myks bug laes .
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Gabion baskets, branches, water bars and barriers, active seeding, capping, contouring, erosion reclamation, boardwalks, stone packing, brush packing, cladding.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The techniques employed are justified in terms of ecological principles.
The teknieks that will be uosd wil then be tangesd to vit whit the eriea and how the erosen is and wer it is in that eriea.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Detect and explain the causes of erosion.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A determination is made of the causes of soil erosion in terms of the likely factors.
Thy woed then see if the eroesen is working on that saet and if there is neetnis to it.Ther woed maby need to be a neew roed. Thy need to prewent owergrasing.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
New road, rutting by vehicles, trampling, overgrazing, bush encroachment, deforestation, aforestation, fire, environmentally inappropriate use of resources, roads, runoff.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The precise nature of the damage done is specified with a view to stopping or limiting soil erosion.
Thy wood dietermen wat damiges is Dan too natser and hoe it can be changed to be inproefd.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5
Detect soil erosion sites.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Accurate observations are carried out for the purpose of detecting the following signs of soil erosion at a site.
Thy go out and observe the eriea and look for sanes of eroesen Missing topsoil, areas denuded of vegetation sou that the can improef on it and thange it so that eroeson don’t takake plas.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Missing topsoil, areas denuded of vegetation

Wildlife Fence 252454

Wildlife Fence 252454
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Prepare an area for fencing.
You need to now wer u wane poet up the fens.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Boundary beacons are placed in order to identify and mark the area to be fenced.
You need to identiefy wer you wane poet up the vens.You need to maaark the earie whit a braet maker so that it is easier to see.Your beekens need to be werie aceret.You need to uos a GPS and a map.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The area is physically cleared or debushed in preparation for fencing.
You need to clien the era so then you will see the line. You need to poet up seport poust then the y standard and the the waer.If you cleer the plas properlie it will be iseer.You need to make soor your naber is not a trater wen it cams to the fens.Wen you clear the bus you can uos pisiekil ,makeniekal,cemiekal.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The area is levelled to facilitate the erection of a fence.
You need to lewel the soel.You can lewel the horesontel fens.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
An outline is given of the prescribed specifications to be adhered to when preparing an area for fencing.
Erect and dismantle a fence.
You will timskaling thenbudget ,laber fors.You need to chek for slope
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The soil type the tape of fence
You need to spesiefay the fens you need to clien neks to the fens then you will have a roede then you will have a faier brake then you will do selektef tining it will redoes the foel loud
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Erect and dismantle a fence.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The prescribed fence is erected to a specified standard.
The tape of fense;Game fensieng,elektriek Doringdrat BabwireSteelwire Bonoks Field mesh The support pols need to be the eksak meserment and y standard and droppers and if it is then the fens will be correct.And the baget needs to be taken in consederason.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The fence is erected on a prescribed line.
Youneed to vand out wer the line needs to be.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Electrification is added to a fence according to indicated specifications.
You need a power source.You need to insulate the fens.You need sanes that it is elektrie fens.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A sacrificial or folding fence is constructed at a river crossing.
You can bild a folding fens it is permenet but the anemals gers poets more..You can buld a sakrfiesel fens.The fens is ther anemals ount go trou but it kos manie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
A fence is dismantled as directed by supervisor in line with organisational standards.
You can reuos your tings.You need to dismantle the fen in a step was way.You need to take the droper of ferst then the y satanderd then you take the waer and roel it in a roel.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Monitor the fence for effectiveness.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Regular patrols are conducted for the purpose of gathering information on the following aspects, the locations, the number of incidents and the particular species that are involved in fence breaching.
You need to patroul the fens and take all the info if the was samting sespiesos then ypou need to take the loukasens GPS cordienets or mark it on a map.If there is a insedent you need to take all the infou and cloes to get to the seloesen and why it hapend.You can dreves ,wolk ,flaes.You will look for the fens it self is it stable bent.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A report is prepared to communicate findings on the effectiveness of the fence.
You need to report thr effective whit comminiekating properlie nes of the fens that it is there for a rieson it is there for is it sirwing the perpers of it is there.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
An assessment is made of what is required to repair weaknesses in the fence.
You need to fieks the problem so that the problem do not happen.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
A description is given of the problems that neighbouring communities experience as a result of animals breaching the fence.
You need to spiek to the nsbrs aboet the problem. It go's boet waes.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Maintain the fence.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A fence is repaired to ensure that it always meets the prescribed standard.
Repair the weekneses that is preskrab troe the loop meterd or the 90 degries.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
River crossings are repaired to the prescribed standard.
You need to fieks the fens nomater.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Weaknesses in a fence are identified and corrected using appropriate techniques, tools and equipment.
You need to identiefa the weekneses and you need to corekt the theknieks yous tools droppers,pliers ,wier puller and the corekt equipment and fieks the river crosiengs.

252453 Problem plant

252453 Problem plant
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Identify all key target problem plant species in a conservation area.
All plants hase difrent riesens why thy ar a problem plant.Moes of ouer problem plants cam from astralie.
Seekelbus; it takes ower it groes ewriewer.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The concept "problem plants" is defined as it applies to nature conservation.
It is a toksiek plant or posenis toewords anemals and it criehat competieson towords ather plants.You will get indiegrenis that is problem plants sam plans that is indiegenis thst is agresave or there is ones that is not agresafe. You get xetotiek that is sam of them are a problem or agresaf or not.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Problem plants in the area of operation is identified and listed.
has been obtained in terms of the National Water Act. The Executive Officer has the power to grant exemption from some of the above requirements. The following species are classified as Category 2 plants: rooikrans (Acacia cyclops); silver wattle (A. dealbata) - this species not allowed in the Western Cape; green wattle (A. decurrens); black wattle (A. mearnsii); Australian blackwood (A. melanoxylon); Port Jackson willow (A. saligna); sisal hemp (Agave sisalana); old man salt bush (Atriplex nummularia); beefwood and horsetail (Casuarina cunninghamiana and C. equisetifolia) - neither of which will be allowed for dune stabilisation; several species of gum trees (Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. cladocalyx, E. diversifolia, E. grandis, E. paniculata, E. sideroxylon and E. lehmannii) - the latter species not allowed in the Western Province (because of their importance for beekeepers, legislation with regard to Eucalyptus species might still be changed; they might be exempted from the need of being controlled wherever they occur outside demarcated areas and, instead, control might only be mandatory in or near watercourses and wetlands); honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos), St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), which may only be grown under controlled conditions; leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) - this species not allowed in the Western Cape; several pine species (Pinus canariensis, P. elliotti, P. halepensis, P. patula, P. pinaster, P. radiata, P. roxburghii and P. taeda); white and grey poplars (Populus alba and P. x canescens); honey and velvet mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa and P. velutina), as well as their hybrids; the commercial guava (Psidium guajava); castor oil plant (Ricinus communis); black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), which may be propagated as a rootstock only, and then only with special authorisation ; watercress (Rorippa nasturtium-aquaticum); European blackberry (Rubus fruticosus); the weeping and crack willows (Salix babylonica and S. fragilis) - not to be confused with the indigenous Salix mucronata, which should not be removed; and Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense).

Plant invaders of Category 3
These plants are undesirable because they have the proven potential of becoming invasive, but most of them are nevertheless popular ornamentals or shade trees that will take a long time to replace. A few of them were placed into this category instead of into category 1 because they do not cause problems in all situations. In terms of Regulation 15 of CARA, Category 3 plants will not be allowed to occur anywhere except in biological control reserves, unless they were already in existence when these regulations went into effect. The conditions on which these already existing plants may be retained are that they do not grow within 30 m from the 1:50 year flood line of watercourses or wetlands, that all reasonable steps are taken to keep the plant from spreading, and that the Executive Officer has the power to impose additional conditions or even prohibit the growing of Category 3 plants in any area where he has reason to believe that these plants will pose a threat to the agricultural resources.
Propagative material of these plants, such as seeds or cuttings, may no longer be planted, propagated, imported, bought, sold or traded in any way. It will, however, be legal to trade in the wood of Category 3 plants, or in other products that do not have the potential to grow or multiply. The Executive Officer will have the power to grant exemption from some of the above requirements.
The following species are Category 3 plant invaders: pepper tree wattle (Acacia elata); pearl acacia (Acacia podalyriifolia); tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima); sponge-fruit salt bush (Atriplex lindleyi subsp. Inflata); two species of orchid trees (Bauhinia purpurea and B. variegata); two species of cotoneasters (Cotoneaster franchetii and C. pannosus); loquat (Eriobotrya japonica); pitanga (Eugenia uniflora) - but not allowed in Northern Province, Mpumalanga or KwaZulu-Natal; Australian silky oak (Grevillea robusta); moonflower (Ipomoea alba) - but not allowed in Northen Province, Mpumalanga or KwaZulu-Natal; morning glory (Ipomoea indica) - but not allowed in Northen Province, Mpumalanga or KwaZulu-Natal; another species of morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea); jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia); five species of privets (Ligustrum japonicum, L. lucidum, L. ovalifolium, L. sinense and L. vulgare) - L. lucidum may be propagated only as a rootstock if special permission has been obtained; St Joseph's lily (Lilium formosanum, also incorrectly called Lilium longiflorum); "syringa" (Melia azedarach); New Zealand christmas tree (Metrosideros excelsa); giant sensitive plant (Mimosa pigra); white mulberry (Morus alba) - excluding clutivar 'Pendula',- may be propagated only as a rootstock , if special permission has been obtained (note that the black mulberry, Morus nigrum, which is the better fruit tree of the two, is not subject to legislation); manatoka (Myoporum tenuifolium subsp. montanum, also sometimes called M. acuminatum); sword fern (Nephrolepis exaltata) - excluding its cultivars; belhambra (Phytolacca dioica); 'Abyssinian' coleus (Plectranthus comosus); pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata); strawberry and Durban guavas (Psidium cattleianum and P. x durbanensis); yellow and Himalayan firethorn (Pyracantha angustifolia and P. crenulata); Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) - but not allowed in KwaZulu-Natal; three senna species (formerly known as cassias) (Senna bicapsularis, S. didymobotrya and S. pendula); jambolan (Syzygium cumini); rose apple (Syzygium jambos); Chinese and pink tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) - neither of which is allowed in the Northern, Western or Eastern Cape; the tipu tree (Tipuana tipu) and the toon tree (Toona ciliata).

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The harmfmecaniekaul impact that these plants have on the environment is explained.
It coed be invasif or not invasef it coed be toksiek or non toksiek it coed be agresaf or no agresaf.It is a pioneer plant.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Apply the appropriate control method(s) accurately and safely.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A suitable method of control is applied while taking relevant factors into consideration.
Cemekal the persen needs to now hoe to work whi it bekos he can get hert if he das not now wen you have a lot of problem plant clos to one a nater you woe duos cemiecal.Wen you have les problem plant you woe duos visiecal or mecaniecal meterd to get rid of them.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
The species involved, their density, their size and stage in their life cycle as well as local management policy.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A justification is given for the method of control that was selected and applied.
You can uoes cemiekal you can yous posen to kiel the plant Roend up can be uosd. It meens that the the patwas is blokt troe the soesen.You can uos mecaniekal wer you doe it whit your hands vorinstens yous a panga.visiekal is wer you woe uos a moeter weekel. Bologiekal;You woed uos samting out of natser to get rid of the plant.Integrater is all the teknieks uosd together.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Chemical, biological & integrated and mechanical.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The advantages and disadvantages of the methods used is explained.
PROS;cemiecal it is efektif and it is qwiek, CONS You need to look at the HOS . It is a enfaremental risk.You need speselasd qekwipment. PROS Biologiecal its not toxic ypou CONS You need to do a lot of riesorts it caties werie sloulie.Mecaniecal cons it is simple it is costefefektif CONSit is laber intens you need speselasd tools. INTERGRATER CONS it is efektafe PROUS you need to plan a hed.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Appropriate control methods are applied safely.
The stafe neds to be trand properlie. Staftie ekwipment needs to be won the tools needs to be servest.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Operate and maintain equipment used in the control of problem plants.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A demonstration is given of competence in handling and maintaining equipment.
The worker needs to be trand to work whit ekwipment and he needs to do it the rat way.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Backpack sprays, axes, pangas and chainsaws (requires special training), calibration of application equipment.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Appropriate tools are selected for the task on hand.
You need to select the tools that you will be uosing for thes operason.Forinstens, raber glaves gas masks, tane sos,steelcaps,goggles,savtie boets.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Selected tools are operated safely and efficiently according to operational and manufacturer's requirements.
The tools needs to be siwest and mantand so tht it works in pervekt condiesens and nating is rong and that workers get hiret.You need to look for fols on the tools so that it can be fieksd.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Equipment is maintained in good working order.
You need to mantan the tools so that it can stay in a working kondieson and so that it can sty in working for longer.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Keep records of treated areas by means of a recognized method.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Areas where problem plants have been identified and/or treated is indicated on suitable maps for record keeping purposes.
You need to ideniefay and the intensetie by a kie on the map sou that you and enie one els can uos it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The plants treated and their precise location is recorded on a area map.
You need to uos simbels to forinstens a sading on the prouses loukason and thet will then meen wer it is wat you did in that eriea. Houemast of that did you uos in that eriea.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The area of operation is located by means of appropriate markings on a map in order to keep record of treated areas.
You wane do it sou you can have trak of wat you did on a skael. So that yur bos now wat is hapenieng. But he rekort on papers need to be cep safe lie stord for fitere uos.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5
Carry out appropriate follow up procedures.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A map or other reference is used to locate previously treated areas to enable follow up procedures.
It is iesier to uos the jps corienits to go bek and take trak of wat hapend there.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The impact/success of previous intervention(s) is monitored to identify the need for follow up procedures.
It is monietord on maps and gps korienits on paper.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The necessity for further intervention is assessed through evaluation of the impact of previous interventions.
If you need to cans the prouses and but you need to do it regerlie and often.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
An accurate record is kept of findings.
There is ower las and that meens that if your last resort not work you can do bek to step one and see wat you can do a boet it.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Follow up treatment is implemented where necessary.
You need to change if it is neseserie.

Monday, December 19, 2011

252452 CONS GUARDIANSHIP

252452 CONS GUARDIANSHIP
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Conduct patrols in order to collect and interpret information associated with Conservation Guardianship.
You need to potroul the eria regerlie.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Observation and listening posts are established in order to observe operational area(s) as it relates to patrolling and Conservation Guardianship requirements.

POSTS;it is plases wat thy col watseng ponts . you poseson your self to have the atwantiet and to observe. You will uos uor senses look you need to look for the angoesel,lisen you need to lisen for anreger soends,smel you need to smel for rotend fles or ganpoder or smoke of segerets and you will uos thes to observe the operaion. Conservation Guardianship requirements is to opserfe at all tames and to take in wat you are opserving .To Observ you need to lisen if there is posts it is soo mahcs more iset to observe.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Routine patrols are executed using appropriate formations to detect any illegal activity.
Thy woed have strikt skejels to abay to.A Straight line is wen ewrie one wolk in ahoriesontale line to the vrant, arrowhead thy wolk in a shape of an arrow, file thy woed wolk behand onea nather to the vrant, wedge thy woed wolk in awedge form, scorpion thy woed wolk in a scorpion and the opeset person has a disatwantieg bekos thy can seround hem and single file thy wolk to the vrant behand etsater.

Straight line arro whead file wedge scorpion
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Straight line, arrowhead, file, wedge, scorpion and single file.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Information is gathered with regard to movement (illegal/legal) inside a conservation area.
(illegal;if samting ore sam one is after the standert tam is on the propertie,sespieses locatens,feneline cuts, sespieses vekals ,if there is sespieses tracks, if the sespieses person have an fire arems, if there is sners.///legal; You have antie poting potrols,you have seciretie patroul,seciretie vehicles,there is an alecated tam on the premeses. The sekerietie needs to now wat to look for in the sekeretie work plaes

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Routine patrols are executed to locate, follow and identify high profile/threatened species within the operational area.
You need to have uor anemals in the potser lookt after permanent sou that uor anemals not get poetsd.You need to identievad the anemals on uor farem that is the high profile anemals that is the risk of potsing.If uor animal is an indangerd spiesies.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Illegal activities are detected through the identification and finding of evidence as it applies to conservation guardianship.
You need to fand the ewedens of the sespieses lokason sou that the erie kan be betrould regalerlie fefor you can arrest sam one.You need to petroul the fenses bekos it is there to kiep tings out.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
React appropriately within the law and according to established procedures, in order to counter any illegal activities.
You need to folou the low.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Suspects and witnesses are approached in a manner that ensures the safety of persons and the maintenance of full control of the situation.
You need to aproets the person and you need to control the sitoehason you need to tink and be fast responding. You need to foulou the saftiy prousegers by arresting them.You need to be safe to words your self. You will identie fay your self and wat your work is there. You will then ask hem to ideniefa himself and wat he is doen on the propertie.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
A suspect is disarmed and his/her weapons are made safe.
The persen needs to be dis arem the person and take enie wepens that thy have. You need to remoef the wepen you need to aproets the person calm but if the sitoehasen gets out of hand you need to take controuel.You need to make the ravel safe.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
Lawful arrests are carried out using minimum force.
You need to arrest hem by a lowvel maner you need to volw the low. You need to uos miniemam fores at all tams.You need to red to hem hes rates to state the series nes of the affens

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Suspects are questioned using techniques that optimize useful information gathering.
You need to qestons the person by a uosvol manet to get informason out of hem.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Collect evidence in order to be able to prosecute a suspect and present evidence in court of law.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The scene of a crime is secured according to standard operational procedures and requirements.
You need to sekeer the scens of the crime so that you don’t loos uor ewedens. You need to handel the the ewedens whit claves and poet them in siplok pakets.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The appropriate collection techniques are utilised while preserving the chain of evidence.
You need to take poutous and you need to set the date and tam of the poetou. You need to uos your voes recorder wen you qeston the person.You need to handel scens whet cer so that you don’t loos the ewedens.You can recor it on aviedieou. Wen you do all thes you need to record the tam dthe date of all the cram sien.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The extent of the offence and individual rights are explained to suspect/s as it applies to legal requirements. You will go to the poelies stasen sou that thy can egsamen the ewedens.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Assist with the preparation of a docket according to operational and legal requirements.
You need to explan the person or the sitoehasen and the series nis of the sitoehason.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
Evidence is presented in court in a credible and consistent way.
You need to do the doket whit all the informason from wer you got to the scen and all the tings that is on the scens and wat hapend on the sien if neserie you need to dro [piekters.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Apply appropriate communication techniques during the operation.
You need to have comoeniecaton thanels.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
A variety of techniques is utilized to ensure the maintaining of communication as it applies to patrol ling
.To ciep comminicaton you need to have a selpoen or a telapoen or you need to folou proesiegers. Wen you are on the cram sien you need to swiets the radie of sou that the ater person cant heer you but you needt to report bake. Handsiegnels don’t have nooses bit thy can commoniect afesenetlie.It is olsou wesel. You need to have amap and or the GPS
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Hand signals, radio procedures, cell phones and geographic references, etc.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Appropriate report formats are used to present information to supervisors and other audiences. There is a spesefiek format will be uost to report for the supervisora and other audiences.You need to report wer you wher wat you wer doend wat tam it was.The format is posetif the negatives and the opertoenaties.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
A verbal debrief is conducted with patrol members and other audiences as it applies to patrol and conservation guardianship operations.
The informason is gifen trou to the proper persen and a sammerie is gifen.IT is beng don so that tings can be don beter and so that tings can be inproeved.